Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Hey guys just an update, i'll be posting a live commentary but it will be recorded from behind me so you can see the panorama display. Basically as if you were standing there watching me play over my shoulder. (I cant record smoothly on BF3 with 3 screens running)
Saturday, April 7, 2012
When i tell people i have a triple screen display they're like "derp ill just got a 50inch tv" Which is EXACTLY the same as one, big monitor so why do they think it competes with a triple monitor? idiots... they're in 2 total different categories. Why people like big TVs and stuff, i don't know. The only difference between a big tv and a normal sized one is (if they are the same quality) how far away you can sit and clearly see and read stuff of the screen. So if you're up close to a giant 50" monitor, you're just stupid and wasting your money. Big tv's require big rooms. Ever been to the movies?
Also when people say they'd rather get a 50" tv for a monitor compared to my triple screen, they have no idea what they are talking about. How much more do you think their field of view in video games increases with a 50" monitor? NONE. With 3 screens, my resolution is 6160x1200. Thats quite a bit more screen space to display quite a bit more stuff to see, therefore my field of view is almost like real life, minus the vertical aspect of things.
Monday, April 2, 2012
Sunday, April 1, 2012
It seems with the HD 7970 coming in aroun $525 average, the GTX680 is an even better deal now because the 680 is more for less! The 680 has better max and min FPS on most benchmarks it has been run on compared to the 7970.
BF3 ultra: 7970 - (max 94) (min 41)
680 - (max 103) (min 42)
3D Mark 11 scores: 7970 - (2753)
680 - (3172)
The Witcher: 7970 - (max 41) (min 21)
680 - (max 44) (min 26)
So why even bother with the 7970 if you'll be paying more and not even getting the performance bonus? And you don't even get a brand to brag about!